Geo Target Your Way To A Higher CTR & Quality Score
Improving your CTR is now the single biggest thing you as an advertiser can do to improve your AdWords quality score and reduce your CPC. When it comes to CTR, every little helps. Today, I’m going to show you two very simply things you can do to increase your CTR and as a result, your quality score. The following can be implemented easily and immediately but as with all changes to your PPC account, make sure you test the results. If it doesn’t work for you, revert.
Google has recently announced that you can now tag your adwords ads with your company address. These are called location extensions. However, many advertisers do NOT want their company address under their ad. We’ll cover that in another blog post. They are also not available in many countries.
Instead, we’re going to use regional targeting to add the County, City or State of the SEARCHER to the bottom of your ad. When the person that’s performing the search sees their OWN City, State or County below their ad they not only see a word they can relate to but an ad that’s a little different to most (if not all) of the other ads on the page. This has an immediate and sometimes astonishing impact on click through rates.
To achieve this we simply need to get a little more granular with our regional targeting in AdWords. It’s really quite simple. Instead of targeting a whole country like the US or Ireland, select “target specific locations within a single country or territories” and select EVERY STATE . You could even select every metropolitan area or even every city to have THOSE show up below the ad.
Likewise, Instead of targeting the whole country of The Republic Of Ireland, select “target specific locations within a single country or territories” and select all 26 Counties in The Republic instead. If you are based in Dublin for example, using this method, a searcher from Cork would see the word “Cork” below your ad.
That’s it! Simply update/upload your campaign, wait a few minute and when someone performs a search from any location that you are now targeting, their city, metro area, State or County will show up below the ad. We have found that in 100% of cases for both us and our clients, combined with gradual CTR increases this has improved our CTR significantly. CTR being the single biggest factor that you as an advertiser can influence towards your quality score, improving CTR is a no-brainer.
While it’s not possible to auto rotate these ads in the same campaign, we had to try and replicate that for this test. We spread it out over a month (yea, low volume) alternating the days that each campaign was enabled. So each ad got the same share of days of the week, times of the day etc. The big drawback here is actual demand for the “product” on any specific day may have skewed the results slightly but I think we got a pretty accurate result that is in line with what we have seen with all our other campaigns.You will notice that the CTR is almost 100% greater and the cost is 100% less.
An increase in relevant CTR (No bounce/back rate) is an effective increase in that keywords quality score.
On the subject, to remove the location from below your ad (I have no idea why you would want to), you can target a specific geographic area using customized targeting. Many thanks to Richard at Apogee for teaching me something new and keeping me on my toes over on the official AdWords help forum.
So there you have it. A simple, yet effective way to improve your quality score without much effort. What other ways have you found to increase the quality score of your keywords?








December 9th, 2009 at 12:57 am
Dave, fantastic post! Now, when is your adwords book coming out!
December 9th, 2009 at 1:08 am
Haha, thanks Keith. I wouldn’t call it fantastic, it’s just a tiny little “tip”. And a book? Pfff, it would have to be revised every week. Not a chance.
December 9th, 2009 at 9:04 am
Yeah – good point. The simplest ones are sometimes the best..
December 9th, 2009 at 9:21 am
Good stuff Dave! Maybe you can help with a quick question, we are finding that if we geo target this way, in many cases a client based in Glasgow may have an IP address located in Manchester and therefore Manchester shows under the adwords ad rather than their true location which can be detrimental. Have you seen the same? Do you know a way around this?
Cheers!
December 9th, 2009 at 10:19 am
dave, although a newbie to ppc i find your posts to be quite informative..thanks n keep it coming..
December 9th, 2009 at 10:29 am
Nice post Dave, especially around the increased CTR and therefore quality score.
I have been using geo-targeting for a client for over a year now, trying to target four locations in the UK. The main problem is the ip addresses “location”, one branch in Scotland shows up a Reading and other branches show up as places miles from the physical location.
Google AdWord are of little help when asked for assistance in this area and I have just had to settle on doing the best I can with the tools available, but also recognising that I am not hitting 100% of searchers physically within the geo area.
December 9th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
Thanks for the mention, Dave. Very glad to have you participating in the AdWords Help forum. You boost the signal-to-noise ratio.
December 10th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
Love your insight on the Adwords game theory! Geographical targeting is sure one finely-tuned technique of marketing!
Edmund
December 10th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Impressive !
Thanks Dave. as Improving your CTR is not only tough enough especially when we are moving upwards our URL in web race. This is great information will surly help me to boost my clients business.
Thanks again.
December 12th, 2009 at 10:39 pm
Good stuff Dave! Maybe you can help with a quick question, we are finding that if we geo target this way, in many cases a client based in Glasgow may have an IP address located in Manchester and therefore Manchester shows under the adwords ad rather than their true location which can be detrimental. Have you seen the same? Do you know a way around this?
December 15th, 2009 at 11:07 pm
I tried this for three different campaigns I am running for three different clients and they ALL saw a reduction in traffic by almost 2/3rds. Any idea why?
December 16th, 2009 at 3:53 am
Yeah, this can prove to be an important factor, only if we are targeting some local areas rather than whole country
December 16th, 2009 at 4:48 pm
Hi,
I understand what you are doing here, but no matter what I do, I can’t get the dialog box that you show in your second screen shot.
Can I be a pain and ask, how did you get to that dialog window please?
Google Adwords help says
Select the Campaigns tab.
Select one or more campaigns. (If you select multiple campaigns, your changes will apply to all selected campaigns.)
In the edit panel, click the Edit link next to Location Targeting.
er….. there is no edit panel and certainly not one that has an edit link next to location. I have to go to settings tab in a campaign, and if I edit teh location I don’t get the dialog box you show.
Eve
December 21st, 2009 at 2:56 pm
Great strategy that is not been used by most advertisers. A very rare thing indeed. Well done and thanks for sharing, I will let you know how it works for me.
December 21st, 2009 at 11:21 pm
As always, great info, Dave!
Lately, though, I’ve noticed that in some cases the CTR may be lower than 1% and the QS still between 7 and 10. Do you think they are counting keyword and account performance history now?
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:24 am
Good stuff Dave! Maybe you can help with a quick question, we are finding that if we geo target this way, in many cases a client based in Glasgow may have an IP address located in Manchester and therefore Manchester shows under the adwords ad rather than their true location which can be detrimental. Have you seen the same
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:45 am
Excellent information. When you launching your ebook?
December 23rd, 2009 at 11:40 pm
very insightful and helpful. i will definitely try localization techniques you’ve suggested. great blog overall; you just got a new fan =) thanks for sharing!
December 25th, 2009 at 4:02 am
Good Stuff. This is great information will surely help boost CTR.
December 26th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
Good information. I have not used much geo targeting in my PPC and this sounds like it would be a very good move for me to make and start using this method. Thank you…
December 27th, 2009 at 1:19 pm
Thanks Dave great advice on Adwords game theory.
December 28th, 2009 at 3:44 am
Not to rain on the parade here, but if you reduce CPC by increasing clicks, you are still maximizing Google’s revenue, not the sites revenue. How does this correlate to monetizable conversions?
December 28th, 2009 at 8:40 am
this is a nice post.Dave your advices are very important and helpful. It will help me a lot in my jobs
December 28th, 2009 at 6:31 pm
Hi David, thanks for stopping by. The point isn’t about conversions. It is assumed that conversion optimization is either already done (can it ever be) or in the process.
The point is about reducing the cost of your clicks (those clicks that convert no less) by improving your quality score.
Lets say you double your quality from 5 to 10 (just an example) and lets say in this example, you half your CPC. For the same budget, you can get double the clicks.
Weather or not they convert is really up to you. The conversion side of things is a topic for another post.
January 4th, 2010 at 12:25 am
fantastic dave since my website is mainly for local i will try your method
January 6th, 2010 at 2:01 am
This is great – but what if I don’t want to show my complete address? Will I get punished by Google with only country/state and no street address?
January 8th, 2010 at 6:41 pm
Great post Dave. I’m looking forward to your next post when you cover how NOT to have your address show up at the bottom of your ads.
January 24th, 2010 at 8:25 am
Neil, use the Google Global geospoofing addon, to preview ads local, then you will see the geotarget under the ad ;)
January 26th, 2010 at 9:26 am
I know this is not strictly related to the post, but out of interest, do you have any idea how accurate the regional targeting is on google.ie?
January 27th, 2010 at 8:02 pm
very good point. Regional specific targeting ads rends to have lower quality score than national open targeting ads due to limited impressions and clicks, do you have any other strategy to overcome a low quality score on regional specific targeting ads?
February 7th, 2010 at 12:57 pm
makes sense if you are targeting local business else i see it as a bad idea.
February 9th, 2010 at 8:22 am
Great post… The more highly targeted, the better! If you want a solid CTR, one trick is to target Gmail from inside your AdWords account. If you create a campaign that is solely served to Gmail, you can achieve laser targeting and higher CTR.
February 12th, 2010 at 11:58 am
Excellent information. I have dabbled in Adwords but havent really looked into it. GEO targetting locla businesses has been turned off for webdesign companies.
February 13th, 2010 at 6:23 pm
I’ve been trying to improve the click through rate of my site. Do you think website optimization has anything to do with click through rate? Appreciate a response, thanks very much!
February 14th, 2010 at 8:22 pm
You just brought up something I took for granted. I assumed that my city + state would show up but if I am able to use this location setting on a geo-targeted campaign then that makes alot of sense. I am going to try that out now.
February 25th, 2010 at 7:10 pm
Hey Dave, I understand how to target different regions, but I’m confused how to get these regions to show up below my ad (without making a new ad for each region)? Thanks!
February 28th, 2010 at 10:20 pm
@Xemytica, no, you will not get penalized.
@Jordan, It’s pretty bad as I am sure you are aware. The closer you are to the city centroid though the better.
@Cassidy, that’s the beauty of it. You just need to target a SINGLE campaign to multiple cities.
March 2nd, 2010 at 6:56 pm
I’m sure it is still better than the ‘Northern Ireland’ regional targeting in the UK (Cant get accurate figures from anyone but I reckon it is less than 50% accurate!)
March 2nd, 2010 at 7:24 pm
I’ve heard from a few sources NI is that bad. I guess due to the small market it’s not even a huge priority for Google either :(
March 3rd, 2010 at 9:19 pm
I am reading more and more about Geo Location tagging being the next big thing on the internet. It’s interesting that the mass of global marketplaces are segmenting once again.