<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Vs PPC &#8211; Search Marketing Is Not A Fight! (Another Mini Case Study)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:39:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daryl James</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-93808</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-93808</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the case studies.  SEO and PPC are simple yet intensive concepts and things like case studies help newbies like me to better absorb the information.  I&#039;d love to see more such articles on your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the case studies.  SEO and PPC are simple yet intensive concepts and things like case studies help newbies like me to better absorb the information.  I&#8217;d love to see more such articles on your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steel supplier</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-93573</link>
		<dc:creator>steel supplier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-93573</guid>
		<description>Great post. PPC data is gold dust for SEO in terms of working out what search times convert and which ones really work in terms of ROI. I would always recomend running a couple of months worth of PPC with a large set of keywords to get as much data as you can.

It is always worth looking at the intent of the search in terms of ROI. Is it an information search of one with intent to buy. It there any confusion in the terms shingles or shutters mean different things to different searches for example. Get your keyword research correct and use your PPC data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. PPC data is gold dust for SEO in terms of working out what search times convert and which ones really work in terms of ROI. I would always recomend running a couple of months worth of PPC with a large set of keywords to get as much data as you can.</p>
<p>It is always worth looking at the intent of the search in terms of ROI. Is it an information search of one with intent to buy. It there any confusion in the terms shingles or shutters mean different things to different searches for example. Get your keyword research correct and use your PPC data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diseño web</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-90694</link>
		<dc:creator>diseño web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-90694</guid>
		<description>Both they are very necessary and they must go in line together like part of a marketing strategy. At the outset he is recommendable to use PPC to obtain immediate results, while the positioning in finders works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both they are very necessary and they must go in line together like part of a marketing strategy. At the outset he is recommendable to use PPC to obtain immediate results, while the positioning in finders works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IDSTC</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-84533</link>
		<dc:creator>IDSTC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-84533</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave, thanks for the interesting article.I was just now told that they do indeed to first be manually reviewed before being eligible to appear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave, thanks for the interesting article.I was just now told that they do indeed to first be manually reviewed before being eligible to appear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Salisbury</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-70912</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Salisbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-70912</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,
Fab post, I totally agree that using SEO and PPC to work together is the best way to secure long term results.  Running a PPC campaign for a few weeks, months if necessary gives us webmasters a good solid idea of what keyword/phrases work and apply them to the SEO campaigns. Thanks very much for sharing. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,<br />
Fab post, I totally agree that using SEO and PPC to work together is the best way to secure long term results.  Running a PPC campaign for a few weeks, months if necessary gives us webmasters a good solid idea of what keyword/phrases work and apply them to the SEO campaigns. Thanks very much for sharing. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milan</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-61284</link>
		<dc:creator>milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-61284</guid>
		<description>Dave,

I&#039;m new to the adwords thing, and I think they&#039; re fooling me. the adcampaign metrics are at 0 impressions and all 0, yet my domain host web-statistics give me 40 hits a day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m new to the adwords thing, and I think they&#8217; re fooling me. the adcampaign metrics are at 0 impressions and all 0, yet my domain host web-statistics give me 40 hits a day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPC Bid Management</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-37864</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC Bid Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-37864</guid>
		<description>Many people view SEO and PPC as 2 sides of coin when in fact we can use them both at the same time. And the best way of doing this is to bid on the same keywords you rank highly for and send PPC traffic to a review’ site. Having traffic sent to your main site through a ‘neutral review’ site greatly boosts sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people view SEO and PPC as 2 sides of coin when in fact we can use them both at the same time. And the best way of doing this is to bid on the same keywords you rank highly for and send PPC traffic to a review’ site. Having traffic sent to your main site through a ‘neutral review’ site greatly boosts sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan - PPC Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-37320</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan - PPC Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-37320</guid>
		<description>Dave, thanks for that url. Ok, seems that their is automation involved in the review process, and a trust factor involved. Drinking coffee is preferable to manually reviewing all new ads, very true indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, thanks for that url. Ok, seems that their is automation involved in the review process, and a trust factor involved. Drinking coffee is preferable to manually reviewing all new ads, very true indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-18424</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-18424</guid>
		<description>Dave,

Interesting enough... the problem with long tails is though that the time you spend on research trawling through the incoming and working out conversions only gives the client a tiny proportion of sales. In the case of this example I got my client right under the hotel for the NAME search... which surely is more important? no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>Interesting enough&#8230; the problem with long tails is though that the time you spend on research trawling through the incoming and working out conversions only gives the client a tiny proportion of sales. In the case of this example I got my client right under the hotel for the NAME search&#8230; which surely is more important? no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Farrell</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-11731</link>
		<dc:creator>James Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 11:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-11731</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave, thanks for the interesting article

I find it interesting that you can rank higher for &quot;dublin hotel&quot; than &quot;hotel dublin&quot; 

I didn&#039;t realise that this makes a difference before now.

Overture doesn&#039;t seem to discriminate on which  is searched for more. 

Did you consider this idea when you ran this campaign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave, thanks for the interesting article</p>
<p>I find it interesting that you can rank higher for &#8220;dublin hotel&#8221; than &#8220;hotel dublin&#8221; </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t realise that this makes a difference before now.</p>
<p>Overture doesn&#8217;t seem to discriminate on which  is searched for more. </p>
<p>Did you consider this idea when you ran this campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-11001</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-11001</guid>
		<description>Very interesting thread Dave... looks like this has been discussed elsewhere and that Dan&#039;s content/keywords may have been flagged by Google. 

This makes sense to me, as I am pretty sure they follow a similar approach to reviewing websites, generally automated/spidered and then when something weird or a flagged item pops up they go in and manually review it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting thread Dave&#8230; looks like this has been discussed elsewhere and that Dan&#8217;s content/keywords may have been flagged by Google. </p>
<p>This makes sense to me, as I am pretty sure they follow a similar approach to reviewing websites, generally automated/spidered and then when something weird or a flagged item pops up they go in and manually review it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-10999</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-10999</guid>
		<description>Although AdWordsAdvisor did not comment, please have a read of this thread on Webmasterworld:

http://www.webmasterworld.com/google_adwords/3383118.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although AdWordsAdvisor did not comment, please have a read of this thread on Webmasterworld:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google_adwords/3383118.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.webmasterworld.com/google_adwords/3383118.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Perach</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-10998</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Perach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-10998</guid>
		<description>It is possible that your ads were manually reviewed very fast, which would explain this.  I have verified this issue 3 times, so I am 99% confident on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible that your ads were manually reviewed very fast, which would explain this.  I have verified this issue 3 times, so I am 99% confident on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Essex Web Site Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-10975</link>
		<dc:creator>Essex Web Site Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-10975</guid>
		<description>Dan and Dave, it most definitely does not need to be approved because I also (not so long ago) ran a brand new campaign, for a new online client and had it above the organic results in no time.

Unless something has changed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan and Dave, it most definitely does not need to be approved because I also (not so long ago) ran a brand new campaign, for a new online client and had it above the organic results in no time.</p>
<p>Unless something has changed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-10675</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-10675</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan, I have just started a new campaign for a client. Brand new, new keywords, new adgroup, new URL and new ad text. Within minutes it was displaying in the number one position above the organic results.

Who told you it needs to be approved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan, I have just started a new campaign for a client. Brand new, new keywords, new adgroup, new URL and new ad text. Within minutes it was displaying in the number one position above the organic results.</p>
<p>Who told you it needs to be approved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Perach</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-10674</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Perach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-10674</guid>
		<description>Dave, I just double checked on the top placements ads... i was just now told that they do indeed to first be manually reviewed before being eligible to appear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, I just double checked on the top placements ads&#8230; i was just now told that they do indeed to first be manually reviewed before being eligible to appear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-10665</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-10665</guid>
		<description>@Dan P, Ads do not need to be manually reviewed to appear as sponsored listings above the organic results (top spot as apposed to right hand column). 

You are right about the partner sites though. Also, ads must be reviewed manually before going live on the content network (for obvious reasons).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan P, Ads do not need to be manually reviewed to appear as sponsored listings above the organic results (top spot as apposed to right hand column). </p>
<p>You are right about the partner sites though. Also, ads must be reviewed manually before going live on the content network (for obvious reasons).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Universos Virtuais</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-8131</link>
		<dc:creator>Universos Virtuais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 23:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-8131</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the nice tips Dave. I am trying to learn about CEO, but in portuguese (i´m portuguese) there isn´t almost nothing about CEO, so, i´m glad i find you blog.
Have a great weekend!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the nice tips Dave. I am trying to learn about CEO, but in portuguese (i´m portuguese) there isn´t almost nothing about CEO, so, i´m glad i find you blog.<br />
Have a great weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan P.</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-7914</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-7914</guid>
		<description>A common reason why an ad may not appear above the organic listings... the &quot;ribbon ads&quot; is that the ad has not yet been manually reviewed... ads MUST be manually reviewed in order to be eligible to appear on Google partner sites... as well as these &quot;ribbon ads&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common reason why an ad may not appear above the organic listings&#8230; the &#8220;ribbon ads&#8221; is that the ad has not yet been manually reviewed&#8230; ads MUST be manually reviewed in order to be eligible to appear on Google partner sites&#8230; as well as these &#8220;ribbon ads&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CustardMite</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-4400</link>
		<dc:creator>CustardMite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-4400</guid>
		<description>On the other hand, you&#039;ll generally get better PPC results for the less generic terms, and more impressions (and hence more savings) on the more generic terms...

But, as you say, trying to rank number one naturally for &#039;mobile phones&#039; or &#039;PDAs&#039; could be &#039;challenging&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, you&#8217;ll generally get better PPC results for the less generic terms, and more impressions (and hence more savings) on the more generic terms&#8230;</p>
<p>But, as you say, trying to rank number one naturally for &#8216;mobile phones&#8217; or &#8216;PDAs&#8217; could be &#8216;challenging&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-4398</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-4398</guid>
		<description>Well, with enough work you can rank number one for a hundred search terms if they are &quot;Long Tail Enough&quot; :) But it&#039;s a lot easier to rank for the less generic terms and pay for the more generic terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, with enough work you can rank number one for a hundred search terms if they are &#8220;Long Tail Enough&#8221; :) But it&#8217;s a lot easier to rank for the less generic terms and pay for the more generic terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CustardMite</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-4396</link>
		<dc:creator>CustardMite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-4396</guid>
		<description>I agree - there&#039;s no way (?) to appear at the top of natural search for hundreds or thousands of search terms - but if you can get the more generic ones, and pick up the low-traffic terms with PPC, you can get the best of both worlds...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; there&#8217;s no way (?) to appear at the top of natural search for hundreds or thousands of search terms &#8211; but if you can get the more generic ones, and pick up the low-traffic terms with PPC, you can get the best of both worlds&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-4395</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-4395</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome Mike. I suggest not only moving focus to organic but using them both as a one two punch approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome Mike. I suggest not only moving focus to organic but using them both as a one two punch approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McMinn</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3823</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McMinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 13:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-3823</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post, we also fell foul of this during us first two months on adwords promoting PDA and mobile phone devices. We got to spending £450 a week with little return so we&#039;ve halted the campaigns until we could focus more on specific keywords that convert. Of course our strategy has now shifted toward organic SEO. Great work please keep it up.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, we also fell foul of this during us first two months on adwords promoting PDA and mobile phone devices. We got to spending £450 a week with little return so we&#8217;ve halted the campaigns until we could focus more on specific keywords that convert. Of course our strategy has now shifted toward organic SEO. Great work please keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CustardMite</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3350</link>
		<dc:creator>CustardMite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-3350</guid>
		<description>At the moment, we send out a weekly report showing the trend of the major metrics over the last four weeks overall, and by adgroup. We also send out a monthly report with a more complete analysis of what&#039;s been happening, what we&#039;ve been doing, and what we&#039;re planning on doing - I know that when I was on the other side of the fence, working for a retailer, this was what I wanted.

On the plus side, it means that there&#039;s really nowhere to hide - if we drop the ball, or even fail to make improvements, they know almost as soon as we do!

Of course, there are clear downsides to this - random (for want of a better word) noise can lead to some interesting phone calls, particularly if my contact isn&#039;t particularly numerate. And it limits the number of adgroups that I can have without losing reporting functionality.

On the whole, it&#039;s a good thing, as it means that we have to keep working on their campaigns (it&#039;s quite easy to spend 99% of your time working on the new campaigns, where improvements are easy to come by), and it means that our clients know that we&#039;re giving them something for their money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the moment, we send out a weekly report showing the trend of the major metrics over the last four weeks overall, and by adgroup. We also send out a monthly report with a more complete analysis of what&#8217;s been happening, what we&#8217;ve been doing, and what we&#8217;re planning on doing &#8211; I know that when I was on the other side of the fence, working for a retailer, this was what I wanted.</p>
<p>On the plus side, it means that there&#8217;s really nowhere to hide &#8211; if we drop the ball, or even fail to make improvements, they know almost as soon as we do!</p>
<p>Of course, there are clear downsides to this &#8211; random (for want of a better word) noise can lead to some interesting phone calls, particularly if my contact isn&#8217;t particularly numerate. And it limits the number of adgroups that I can have without losing reporting functionality.</p>
<p>On the whole, it&#8217;s a good thing, as it means that we have to keep working on their campaigns (it&#8217;s quite easy to spend 99% of your time working on the new campaigns, where improvements are easy to come by), and it means that our clients know that we&#8217;re giving them something for their money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3349</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-3349</guid>
		<description>Absolutely flexibility is important. But as too is showing results and having the motivation to show results on the agencies part. We have clients from the absolute minimum level to some pretty top tier spenders.

It also depends on their exact requirements. For example, a client may come specifically for search engine optimisation and not require PPC management, or already have a firm grip on their SEO and need some prefessional pay per click campaign management. Then there are those that require a full service online marketing campaign encapsulating everything. Sometimes, all they need is a little advice to send them on the right path.

Search marketing is a service, not a product. And it needs to be treated that way. It needs to be priced differently for each client according to their exact needs and goals and to insure they get the best possible return on their inventment.

Experimenting with pricing at the end of the day is really the only way you can know for sure though. Those who entered the search engine marketing industry early have this to their advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely flexibility is important. But as too is showing results and having the motivation to show results on the agencies part. We have clients from the absolute minimum level to some pretty top tier spenders.</p>
<p>It also depends on their exact requirements. For example, a client may come specifically for search engine optimisation and not require PPC management, or already have a firm grip on their SEO and need some prefessional pay per click campaign management. Then there are those that require a full service online marketing campaign encapsulating everything. Sometimes, all they need is a little advice to send them on the right path.</p>
<p>Search marketing is a service, not a product. And it needs to be treated that way. It needs to be priced differently for each client according to their exact needs and goals and to insure they get the best possible return on their inventment.</p>
<p>Experimenting with pricing at the end of the day is really the only way you can know for sure though. Those who entered the search engine marketing industry early have this to their advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CustardMite</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>CustardMite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 10:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>I think the difference is in that my Agency are quite new, and in the past the majority of our clients have been quite small. Frequently, they have had no prior history on Adwords, or what they are expecting or willing to accept in terms of performance - in some instances not even knowing what their breakeven CPA would be (in the case of new companies).

This is changing over time, and perhaps we should consider offering different types of contract to different customers, though it&#039;s not a decision for me to make.

I think that flexibility is probably important in our position, where we have clients with budgets ranging from £10 per day up, and if our competitors offer alternatives that we don&#039;t (or vice-versa), it&#039;s quite important...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the difference is in that my Agency are quite new, and in the past the majority of our clients have been quite small. Frequently, they have had no prior history on Adwords, or what they are expecting or willing to accept in terms of performance &#8211; in some instances not even knowing what their breakeven CPA would be (in the case of new companies).</p>
<p>This is changing over time, and perhaps we should consider offering different types of contract to different customers, though it&#8217;s not a decision for me to make.</p>
<p>I think that flexibility is probably important in our position, where we have clients with budgets ranging from £10 per day up, and if our competitors offer alternatives that we don&#8217;t (or vice-versa), it&#8217;s quite important&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 17:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>Of course isolated metrics can be manipulated but what client hires a SEM firm to increase a single metric? The only one that matters is ROI or ROAS. 

We use a very common hybrid pricing model for larger accounts. That being a small % of advertising spend increasing at set milestone ROI increments. This has worked amazingly well as it reduces the risk for the client initially and as I said, incentivises the agency to achieve goals rather than just &quot;Monitor&quot; the account until the end of the contract. This model also insures that the client is NEVER experiencing a ROI smaller than what they had before they hired the agency. Even WITH the agency fees.

Inflating statistics serves neither client or agency and any agency basing their fees or performance on this should be.... well, shut down. It is important for clients to use due diligence and understand this concept. 

Regarding trying new ideas with risk to your own agency revenue, that is completely up to you of course. But we all know that those that do not innovate get left behind. Also, if you try something completely new and outside the box and it works well, you can apply the technique  to other clients campaigns. If you are working on a performance basis again, everyone wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course isolated metrics can be manipulated but what client hires a SEM firm to increase a single metric? The only one that matters is ROI or ROAS. </p>
<p>We use a very common hybrid pricing model for larger accounts. That being a small % of advertising spend increasing at set milestone ROI increments. This has worked amazingly well as it reduces the risk for the client initially and as I said, incentivises the agency to achieve goals rather than just &#8220;Monitor&#8221; the account until the end of the contract. This model also insures that the client is NEVER experiencing a ROI smaller than what they had before they hired the agency. Even WITH the agency fees.</p>
<p>Inflating statistics serves neither client or agency and any agency basing their fees or performance on this should be&#8230;. well, shut down. It is important for clients to use due diligence and understand this concept. </p>
<p>Regarding trying new ideas with risk to your own agency revenue, that is completely up to you of course. But we all know that those that do not innovate get left behind. Also, if you try something completely new and outside the box and it works well, you can apply the technique  to other clients campaigns. If you are working on a performance basis again, everyone wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CustardMite</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3227</link>
		<dc:creator>CustardMite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-3227</guid>
		<description>Not sure that I&#039;m that keen on performance-based charging.

From my perspective, I&#039;d feel more cautious about trying new ideas, if I know that they&#039;re going to cost my business money if they don&#039;t work (I&#039;m happy enough to take risks with other people&#039;s money!).

Also, from the client&#039;s perspective, if we start performing far better than they were expecting, they may start suspecting our original estimates and forecasts. And let&#039;s face it, if it&#039;s a new campaign starting from scratch, they are a bit hit-and-miss to begin with.

Unscrupulous agencies could deliberately overstate the expected cost per click (or conversion) in order to get more money from their clients. We use a fixed fee, and as somebody who used to be a client, I&#039;d be more comfortable with this, particularly if I only had a restrictive budget.

It&#039;s always possible to &#039;cheat&#039; to improve a statistic in isolation - cpc or cpa can be fiddled by reducing the bids, and getting less traffic but more cheaply. Clicks can be inflated with less relevant keywords or vague adverts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure that I&#8217;m that keen on performance-based charging.</p>
<p>From my perspective, I&#8217;d feel more cautious about trying new ideas, if I know that they&#8217;re going to cost my business money if they don&#8217;t work (I&#8217;m happy enough to take risks with other people&#8217;s money!).</p>
<p>Also, from the client&#8217;s perspective, if we start performing far better than they were expecting, they may start suspecting our original estimates and forecasts. And let&#8217;s face it, if it&#8217;s a new campaign starting from scratch, they are a bit hit-and-miss to begin with.</p>
<p>Unscrupulous agencies could deliberately overstate the expected cost per click (or conversion) in order to get more money from their clients. We use a fixed fee, and as somebody who used to be a client, I&#8217;d be more comfortable with this, particularly if I only had a restrictive budget.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always possible to &#8216;cheat&#8217; to improve a statistic in isolation &#8211; cpc or cpa can be fiddled by reducing the bids, and getting less traffic but more cheaply. Clicks can be inflated with less relevant keywords or vague adverts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3004</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/seo-vs-ppc-search-marketing-is-not-a-fight-another-mini-case-study/#comment-3004</guid>
		<description>Some good points CustardMite. In the case of no other paid results being shown, that&#039;s fine. However a broad match campaign could generate some additional trafic on never before searched for term combinations.

I agree, agencies that deal only in PPC have absolutely no incentive to deal with this. In fact, it is in their best interests not to deal with it. That&#039;s why it&#039;s important to deal with an agency that is not only proficient in both but also works with the client to suggest additional work for the SEO team (Whoever that may be). It is also important for agencies to offer a performance based cap and important for clients to ask for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good points CustardMite. In the case of no other paid results being shown, that&#8217;s fine. However a broad match campaign could generate some additional trafic on never before searched for term combinations.</p>
<p>I agree, agencies that deal only in PPC have absolutely no incentive to deal with this. In fact, it is in their best interests not to deal with it. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s important to deal with an agency that is not only proficient in both but also works with the client to suggest additional work for the SEO team (Whoever that may be). It is also important for agencies to offer a performance based cap and important for clients to ask for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
