<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Search Advertising &#8211; What The Future Holds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/mobile-search-what-the-future-holds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/mobile-search-what-the-future-holds/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:46:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Swampthing</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/mobile-search-what-the-future-holds/comment-page-1/#comment-6766</link>
		<dc:creator>Swampthing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/mobile-search-what-the-future-holds/#comment-6766</guid>
		<description>I guess we have 2 differences of opinions.  

What consumer / mobile web user does not want the ability to interact with products everywhere we go?

Why not in &#039;one click&#039; or say the keyword, logo, trademark, slogan and be directed to the mobile web page to get further information? 

First, Why type?
Second, Advertising with the greatest, PC search engine, can be so much more than clicking banners and receiving unwanted usless information on your mobile device.

Why not bill the brands to avoid click fraud and give the web user and consumer the greatest tool to navigate to content?  

Isn&#039;t &#039;one click navigation&#039; less time searching?

What happens if Microsoft sees this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we have 2 differences of opinions.  </p>
<p>What consumer / mobile web user does not want the ability to interact with products everywhere we go?</p>
<p>Why not in &#8216;one click&#8217; or say the keyword, logo, trademark, slogan and be directed to the mobile web page to get further information? </p>
<p>First, Why type?<br />
Second, Advertising with the greatest, PC search engine, can be so much more than clicking banners and receiving unwanted usless information on your mobile device.</p>
<p>Why not bill the brands to avoid click fraud and give the web user and consumer the greatest tool to navigate to content?  </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t &#8216;one click navigation&#8217; less time searching?</p>
<p>What happens if Microsoft sees this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/mobile-search-what-the-future-holds/comment-page-1/#comment-6764</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/mobile-search-what-the-future-holds/#comment-6764</guid>
		<description>Swampthing, Google is so great for mobile for two major reasons that spring to mind.

The first is that mobile search ads occupy far higher of a percentage of screen real estate and with AdWords click-to-call campaigns, you can have a potential prospect put in direct phone contact with you when they are searching for what you offer.

With mobile search ads, your listing is technically the number one spot. Who doesn&#039;t want that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swampthing, Google is so great for mobile for two major reasons that spring to mind.</p>
<p>The first is that mobile search ads occupy far higher of a percentage of screen real estate and with AdWords click-to-call campaigns, you can have a potential prospect put in direct phone contact with you when they are searching for what you offer.</p>
<p>With mobile search ads, your listing is technically the number one spot. Who doesn&#8217;t want that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swampthing</title>
		<link>http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/mobile-search-what-the-future-holds/comment-page-1/#comment-6271</link>
		<dc:creator>Swampthing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/mobile-search-what-the-future-holds/#comment-6271</guid>
		<description>Search Engines like Google are great for the PC.  Why is Google so great for mobile?

Why should I click thru a multitude of pop ups or ads, waste MY mobile minutes, when I can go straight to the products sight? 

One click from the keyword, logo, trademark, billboard, QR, 1D, 2D, UPC, etc., and I get directed right to the product or business.  I can then be turned on to get location, coupons, price of a product, menus, schedule, tickets, etc all in one click.

What will Google have when I can say it and be instantly linked?  Doesn&#039;t this affect their businesss model? Direct to content.

I would reather just qode it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search Engines like Google are great for the PC.  Why is Google so great for mobile?</p>
<p>Why should I click thru a multitude of pop ups or ads, waste MY mobile minutes, when I can go straight to the products sight? </p>
<p>One click from the keyword, logo, trademark, billboard, QR, 1D, 2D, UPC, etc., and I get directed right to the product or business.  I can then be turned on to get location, coupons, price of a product, menus, schedule, tickets, etc all in one click.</p>
<p>What will Google have when I can say it and be instantly linked?  Doesn&#8217;t this affect their businesss model? Direct to content.</p>
<p>I would reather just qode it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
